This article looks at form criticism, source literary criticism, and redaction criticism. It originated in the 18th century with the work of jean. In the pauline writings, as noted above, gospel, kerygma, and creed come close together from oral to written formulas that were transmitted about the christ event. Form criticism definition and meaning collins english. Because no originals exist of the sixtysix books of the bible, textual criticism must be applied to scripture to reconstruct the true text. A literary form that use events and dramatic symbolic language to offer hope to people in crisis why is it important to understand literary forms found in scripture it prevents us from misunderstanding and help us to discover what the inspired author intended to teach. It is believed that form criticism is the product of historical skepticism derived from source criticism, which was ultimately laid out by the philosophical foundation of the enlightenment. Form criticism, a method of biblical criticism that seeks to classify units of scripture into literary patterns such as love poems, parables, sayings, elegies, legends and that attempts to trace each type to its period of oral transmission. Source and form criticism of the bible essay graduateway. Source criticism searches the texts for evidence of original sources. Determines what source s the gospels and other nt writers used to compose their works form criticism seeks to discover the type of literature contained in the bible so that one can distinguish between these literary forms and interpret them accordingly.
Form, source, and redaction criticism oxford handbooks. Form criticism definition, a method of textual analysis, applied especially to the bible, in which the origin and history of certain passages are traced by isolating their literary forms, as miracle story, saying, or apothegm, on the assumption that they were fixed by oral tradition prior to compilation in written form. Further steps including form criticism and redaction criticism must. Those believers who have truly been saved, sanctified and filled with the holy spirit are blessed with a might filter know as discernment and are secure in the infallible promise of god by the new covenant heb 10.
Because form criticism assumes a basic change in the gospel material, form critics apply certain form criteria or laws of tradition e. Hence both types of criticisms compliment one another in the analysis of the bible whilst trying to decide where a source was formed and why such sources were. As with source criticism, this new type of criticism was first applied to the old testament then moved on to the new testament later. Redaction criticism of the nt was developed in germany after the second world war and in britain and north america during and after the 1950s. They are supposedly distinguishable by the use of the terms yahweh and elohim. Form criticism, like source criticism, literary criticism, and redaction criticism, is a scientific method of interpreting the texts of the old testament. More example sentences using the techniques of source criticism and form criticism, historicalcritical scholarship analyzed biblical pericopes and looked through them to. The purpose is to determine the original form and the relationship of the life and thought of the period to the development of the literary tradition. Formsourceredactionsocio historical criticism flashcards.
The limits of form criticism in the study of literature, with reflections on psalm 34. Form criticism as a method of biblical criticism classifies units of scripture by literary pattern and then attempts to trace each type to its period of oral transmission. Form criticism definition of form criticism by merriamwebster. Therefore, textual criticism is not criticizing the bible. Yahwistic j the oldest of these is the yahwistic source, designated by the letter j because it consistently uses the name yhvh spelled jahweh in german and because of its special. Source criticism is needed to explain this sort of evidence, and it has not been displaced either by form criticism, which tries to explain how a story or saying was used in the oral tradition of the church before being incorporated into a source, or by redaction criticism, which seeks to analyse the new testament writers use of their sources. They are methodological steps on a path to seeking the origin and provenance of the biblical texts from about 1900 to 1975. Gospel criticism source and form criticism page 4 b final gospel of luke added material from mark b. The source critic reads the book of genesis, for example, and asks, where did the author get this information. In this paper the synoptic problem will be addressed from three different angles. Explain how source criticism and form criticism have.
Form criticism is a method of analysing a text in terms of its prehistory in oral tradition, analysing of the bible by tracing the history of its content by literary forms such as parables and psalms. Most of the book is a collection of excerpts from the work of the pioneering biblical literary critics of the 1970s and 1980s. Source criticism is a form of study used by some bible interpreters to help determine potential human sources used to influence or compile the text of a biblical book. Gospel criticism source and form criticism page 2 ii. Even in the time of jesus, it is estimated that less than ten percent of adults were literate. Source, form, and redaction criticism are scientific methods used in interpreting the texts of the bible. Source criticism sometimes referred to as literary criticism tries to identify the sources upon which a text relies. It goes on to seek the sociological setting for each texts genre, its situation in life german. Sep 04, 2016 source criticism, in biblical criticism, refers to the attempt to establish the sources used by the authors and redactors of a biblical text. It is the oldest method of critical biblical study except for textual criticism. Form criticism begins by identifying a texts genre or conventional literary form, such as parables, proverbs, epistles, or love poems.
Form critics try to identify these units within the text, compare them to each other and work. Blocks of markan material inserted in the basic structure 6. A method of textual criticism, applied especially to the bible, for tracing the origin and history of certain passages through systematic study of the. As a result, conservative christians often view form criticism with suspicion. Analysis of the bible by tracing the history of its content of parables, psalms, and other literary forms.
Second, form criticism emphasizes the important role of oral tradition in ancient culture. Mar 27, 2014 form criticism new testament duration. Form criticism is possible because in oral transmission and in some types of written transmission, particular types of material tend to take specific, repetitive forms. Detailed study of the text, however, has led modern critical scholarship to theorize that the torah is a compilation from several sources, different streams of literary traditions that were composed and collected over the course of the biblical period ca. Explain how source criticism and form criticism have contributed to our understanding of the pentateuch before we can discuss this question, we must first explain what is meant by source criticism, form criticism and the pentateuch. Watch out for this when you use critical commentaries. Source criticism is a specialized field of biblical studies that seeks to determine the sources used to develop the final form of the biblical text. Some axioms of form criticism formcritical methods were first applied systematically to the gospels by three german scholars. Form criticism definition of form criticism by the free. Mar 18, 2006 form criticism is possible because in oral transmission and in some types of written transmission, particular types of material tend to take specific, repetitive forms. One aspect of historical criticism, source criticism is particularly concerned with identifying potential sources and precursors of the text we have now. Form criticism had been used in germany since about 1900 to explore some of. It first appeared in the seventieth and eighteenth centuries when scholars began to read the bible from a secular. Tradition criticism, in the study of biblical literature, method of criticism of the hebrew bible old testament and the new testament that attempts to trace the developmental stages of the oral tradition, from its historical emergence to its literary presentation in scripture.
A 28page booklet with a series of articles and activities on the synoptic problem. Source criticism, in biblical criticism, refers to the attempt to establish the sources used by the authors and redactors of a biblical text it originated in the 18th century with the work of jean astruc, who adapted the methods already developed for investigating the texts of classical antiquity in particular, homers iliad to his own investigation into the sources of the book of genesis. Documentary hypothesis historical criticism, form criticism, and tradition criticism duration. Comparing source, form, redaction and literary criticism in. Source criticism seeks to identify independent source documents behind the present biblical texts. The horsemen of the apocalypse is a reference to the new testament book of revelation, where the horsemen appear to signal the end of the world as we know it. Form criticism identifies short units of text and seeks to identify their original setting. Of major concern is the fact that many form critics have a bias against supernaturalism and dismiss the miracles of jesus as myths.
Jan 02, 2020 form criticism is a favorite among scholars who deny the authority and inerrancy of scripture. This approach is, at least in part, a response to the tendency of source and form criticism to break the texts into small and often disparate units. There is great agreement among scholars that the torah, the pentateuch, in its final form, is a work composed and edited from four literary complexes. Prepared for edexcel religious studies new testament 2016.
However, the big difference is the importance of the. Textual criticism collects and examines the evidence about written works in an attempt to recover the original text. Textual criticism examines the text and its manuscripts to identify what the original text would have said. It assumes that the gospels are made up of units of text for example, parables or miracle stories and that these units were passed down as part of an oral wordofmouth tradition before they were written down in the gospels. The form critics had in a way anticipated redaction criticism by recognizing that there is one sectionthe passion narrativewhich is a unity, with reliable topographical and chronological details, but with variations e. In the apostolic fathers early 2nd century, the transition was made from oral to written tradition. Source criticism is the tool scholars use to figure out what sources, or materials, biblical authors drew on. Due to the emphasis of form criticism on genre analysis and the common structuring devices that accompany specific genres, movie clips provide a nice entryway into the study of forms. Criticism and interpretation, in literature form and society in modern literature subjects.
Narrative, whatever its medium, holds the interest of an audience by raising questions in their minds, and delaying the answers david lodge, the art of fiction. What are the four distinctions between form criticism and. Form criticism definition is a method of criticism for determining the sources and historicity of biblical writings through analysis of the writings in terms of ancient literary forms and oral traditions such as love poems, parables, and proverbs. Redaction criticism, which grew out of form criticism, studies the collection, arrangement, editing and modification of sources by comparing various manuscripts and considering the theological. This volume takes its title from the 1968 address of james muilenburg, form criticism and beyond. Form criticism is most associated with the work of german scholars martin dibelius 18831947 and rudolf bultmann 18841976, though it was developed by herman gunkel and first applied to the. John gottmans four horsemen of the apocalypse at least alphabetically. This is best illustrated in the beginning for childrens stories, once upon a time. Form criticism is a favorite among scholars who deny the authority and inerrancy of scripture. It assumed the widely agreed conclusion of source criticism of the priority of mark and the view that the gospel of john was later than the other three but the aim was to penetrate into the period of church life before even the earliest sources had been written. The torah may seem to present a unified account of israelite history and law during the patriarchal and mosaic periods. Literary criticism constitutes the first methodological step on the path to seeking the origin and provenance of a text. An example of the use of source criticism is the famous pentateuch division between source j and e. Therefore source criticism and form criticism are crucial in the formation of the bible in determining the authors perspective and the aspects in which those perspectives were derived.
This field of study came to prominence in the eighteenth century when jean astruc used the methods applied in source criticism to homers illiad to the text of genesis. Form criticism definition of form criticism by merriam. There is a danger, however, of finding special oral forms everywhere just because one wants to apply form criticism. Source criticism has been around for hundreds of years but form criticism only developed in the 20th century in the works of a group of german bible scholars. Each of these is primarily historical and precompositional in its concerns. Thus the focus of narrative criticism is always in the final form of the text. When scholars read genesis 1 and 2 they apply source criticism to explain why there are two very similar stories side by side in the same book, but which contain striking differences. It was initially called higher criticism to distinguish it from lower or textual criticism, then called literary criticism because of its emphasis on written documents. Comparing source, form, redaction and literary criticism. What written documents andor oral traditions contributed to the stories.
Like source criticism, redaction criticism regards the gospels as being composed from various sources available to the gospelwriter mark, q, protogospels. Most gatherings of early christians would have been dependent upon memorizing the reading of biblical writings by those who were literate. For example, the sociological setting of a law is a court, or the sociological setting of a psalm of. The section on form criticism covers presuppositions, definition, form criticism according to w. Evaluation 1 unlikely that m existed in written form 2 protoluke hypothesis may help to explain the structure of luke. Reconstructing the wording of the original text autograph by comparing handwritten manuscripts mss 2. Biblical literature biblical literature form criticism. Some axioms of form criticism form critical methods were first applied systematically to the gospels by three german scholars. The section on source literary criticism deals the ambiguity of the terms, source and literary criticism. As with ot work, it accepts the principles and necessity of source criticism and recognizes the importance stressed by form critics of the oral period in which traditions about jesus were passed on in. Redaction criticism oxford biblical studies online. Form criticism definition of form criticism by lexico. Like form criticism, redaction criticism also acknowledges these sources are composed from units pericopae that grew out of an oral tradition before they came to be written down.
1401 313 1526 878 892 1513 889 574 524 676 1322 1339 1261 81 519 1368 1383 893 822 1010 319 521 742 802 460 747 547 944 1294 1290 330 100 155 1500 264 1413 1440 1238 1151 204 903 749 683 680 1133 1333 946